Acer Swift SF314-510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-510G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Brahma_TL
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 313
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 696
73% 585 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1482) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 27.9
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 19.9
20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 700 676 698 557 511 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,057
Write 1,007
Mixed 1,085
SusWrite 649
214% 950 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 84.7
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 725
562% 770 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 207%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 44.2
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 47.2
SC Mixed 16.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 126%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-510G Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback