Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime32.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 06:23
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 764
73% 602 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8738) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.8% Above average
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 32.3
27% 32.9 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 131
Splatting 113
109% 136 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 344
Write 330
Mixed 260
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 16.1
74% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 32.4
70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
358GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 147 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 85
SusWrite 148
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB Builds (Compare 2,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S-IB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback