MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 92
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 334
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,175
Write 3,798
Mixed 3,924
885% 3,966 MB/s
4K Read 263
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 244
833% 245 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 748
605% 855 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Crucial_CT275MX300SSD1 1TB
335GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 82 81 83 82 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 63.5
Write 65
Mixed 29
SusWrite 78.8
13% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 15%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
465GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 52 52 52 107 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 97
Write 94.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 74.2
102% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8764 B473C970 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback