MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131031
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 181
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 359
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 203 146 132 137 138 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.5% Good
Read 254
Write 240
Mixed 236
SusWrite 166
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 27.6
103% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 196
147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 95%
Crucial_CT275MX300SSD1 1TB
456GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 78 82 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 89.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 81.3
16% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 15%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
492GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 111 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 108
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 110
133% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8764 B473C970 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback