Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 71 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 90.7 47% 72.8 Pts	4-Core 57.5 8-Core 86.1 9% 71.8 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1A46 1421) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.4 2% 1.6 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 605GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 429 379 375 362 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 410 Write 420 Mixed 311 SusWrite 374 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 27 90% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 277 217% 301 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-020.A00LF 1x8GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 5.7 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples	17x
Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples	14x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	31x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 406 samples	27x
99U5469-046.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 21%, 342 samples	1x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,616 samples	1x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $207