HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory179.5 GB free of 192.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 12:17
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 352
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 4
8% 12 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 15.2
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC71705
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 206 222 222 204 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 235
Write 165
Mixed 154
SusWrite 216
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 24.3
85% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 133
113% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
438GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 126 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 129
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 126
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 113 114 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 115
Write 109
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 119 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 72
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 118 119 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M... 226GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback