TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2324FV6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2324FV6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2324FV6
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 12:15
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 112
47% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 177
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 45.7%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.37%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 35 111 17 44 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 229
Write 102
Mixed 167
SusWrite 53.2
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 15.4
50% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 21.4
54% 117 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 35.5%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CH9 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 45.1%
 Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 2324FV6 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2324FV6

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel  $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples7x
GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples7x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples1x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples1x
RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples2x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback