PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171228 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 17 '22 at 06:22 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,010
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
70.9%
Very good
|
73% 129 Pts
|
74% 601 Pts
|
162% 2,406 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2080-$525
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
127%
Outstanding
|
134% 168 fps
|
120% 146 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 396 409 408 413 414 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
89% 394 MB/s
|
110% 42.2 MB/s
|
208% 297 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$205
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 133 139 140 141 MB/s
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
103% 140 MB/s
|
166% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
50.7%
Above average
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 10 | 8 | 144 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACR064D Acer XF270H B |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 5,469 samples | 218x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $325Bench 78%, 23,961 samples | 94x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $310Bench 80%, 29,291 samples | 62x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $706Bench 173%, 336,216 samples | 124x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,500Bench 236%, 113,450 samples | 70x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $500Bench 118%, 601,881 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $798 |