Gigabyte GA-Z390 D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 D  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 22:21
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 267
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 677
76% 599 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 109
Parallax 121
93% 115 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 115
Splatting 100
102% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 422
Mixed 306
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 31.7
131% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 151
166% 280 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
500GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 454
Mixed 417
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 53.1
174% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
3GB free
Firmware: 0708
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30
Write 30.8
Mixed 29.3
23% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
37GB free
Firmware: 0739
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 24.3
Mixed 36.7
22% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.5
230% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.2
Write 89.3
Mixed 67.5
63% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
52GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 13 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 38.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 13.9
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 97%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
38GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,689
Write 10.7
Mixed 22.7
1,266% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 772
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
2,932% 258 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
ST1000DX 001-1CM162 1TB
4GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.5 8 8.1 8.2 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 24.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 10.6
33% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 31%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.8 7.4 7.9 7.9 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Read 35
Write 36.2
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 7.6
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C16/16G 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 D Builds (Compare 2,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback