Skikk NUC11BTMi9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive497% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSkikk NUC11BTMi9  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel NUC11DBBi9
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i9-11900KB
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 174
2-Core 328
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 976
99% 804 Pts
64-Core 1368
85% 1368 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 140
Parallax 138
98% 133 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 108
Splatting 119
108% 134 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3169 3246 3289 3397 3403 3388 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
497% Outstanding
Read 3,017
Write 3,374
Mixed 3,056
SusWrite 3,315
721% 3,190 MB/s
4K Read 80.4
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 115
379% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,242
931% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 497%
Great: 526%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
63GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 240 251 260 265 265 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 110
Write 97.2
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 254
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 9.5
36% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 13.5
11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 34.8
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 20.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11BTMi9 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Skikk NUC11BTMi9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 184% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback