Lenovo 30A0A0HL00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A0A0HL00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 10:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 190
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 566
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 82.1
Parallax 52.9
48% 64.7 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 47.3
44% 55 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDSC2KB480G7K 480GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SCV1CS05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 318 319 323 319 316 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75% Very good
Read 286
Write 328
Mixed 300
SusWrite 298
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 27.7
110% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 222
180% 250 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
320GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 42 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 38.8
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 41.4
50% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A0A0HL00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 30A0A0HL00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback