Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 174 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 227 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 18.7 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 17.2 14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 179 201 179 175 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.4% Poor	Read 79.2 Write 94.7 Mixed 78 SusWrite 179 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 9.6 38% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 16.2 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 124GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 100 99 96 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 97.5 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 96.8 63% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 6GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 16.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $155