Asus Q304UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus Q304UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q304UAK
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 02:50
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 47%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 148
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 229
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1480) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9670
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 5.9
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 1
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Udore 512GB 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 290 332 288 320 319 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
Read 400
Write 330
Mixed 319
SusWrite 300
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 18.2
97% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 27.1
80% 166 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB MARKVISION 12GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q304UAK Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback