MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 06:21
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$189
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 175
2-Core 333
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 910
99% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,306
81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 189
Parallax 175
15% 127 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 152
Splatting 7.1
86% 119 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
914GB free
Firmware: 3B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 1107 1209 1224 1868 1882 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 2,122
Mixed 1,596
SusWrite 1,406
379% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 100
299% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 636
591% 937 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 292%
Great: 372%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB
5.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 41 53 60 74 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 61.4
Mixed 121
SusWrite 58.6
59% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 116 115 110 113 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
WD Elements SE 2622 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 106 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 18.2
Write 44.6
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 107
86% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 12.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $978
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback