Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '17 at 19:47
Run Duration	536 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 556 60% 478 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.2% Average	Lighting 56.5 Reflection 55.5 Parallax 57.6 46% 56.5 fps	MRender 61.4 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 80.4 56% 66 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7221 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1419 (B1) Unknown 97 97 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 84 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23826853212	71.9% Very good	Read 484 Write 317 Mixed 340 84% 380 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 17.4 71% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 81.5 110% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 591GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 132 132 21493645599 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1426 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7326 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1418 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1435 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1435 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 167504248864 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.6% Good	Read 113 Write 98.4 Mixed 113 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 52GB free Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7360 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4343 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8117 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2284 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 65537 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 50 29 (C2) HDA temperature 151 88 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 351312 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 158 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 479	38.3% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 77.8 Mixed 59.8 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.38 88% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 44%
Spaceloop XL 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Read 25.6 Write 5.97 Mixed 9.85 14% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.08 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 24% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 7%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.66% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 4.37 Mixed 6.61 12% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.55 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.006 25% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 10%
Kingston DTR30G2 64GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 145 Write 30.1 Mixed 20.4 59% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.7 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF - $130

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	276x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	229x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	136x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	93x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	81x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	71x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	48x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	32x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	46x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	24x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16