Medion E15308

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion E15308  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NS1xAD
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 20:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 160
54% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 162
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.30
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.4
1% 3.73 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 7
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S40RF128G 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 81 117 89 140 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 428
Write 286
Mixed 286
SusWrite 132
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 18.7
73% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 33.2
60% 120 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E15308 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15308

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback