JW JW-PH67A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardJW JW-PH67A  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 270
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 36.3
21% 29.8 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 20
20% 25.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Doggo DQ-120G 120GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEA1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 27 40 36 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
464GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 28 41 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 40.1
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 117 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 121
Write 105
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 113
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JW-PH67A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: JW JW-PH67A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback