Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X403JA
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210305
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '22 at 06:54
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	26%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Memory 23.3 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 35.7 16% 26.3 Pts	4-Core 65 8-Core 102 10% 83.2 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1162) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.39% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 9.8 Parallax 8.5 7% 8.8 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 8.8 Splatting 11.1 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.39% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL HBRPEKNX02 512GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: G002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 566 638 664 625 619 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 666 Write 631 Mixed 569 SusWrite 616 140% 620 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 18.5 66% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 140 103% 138 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 204%
Nvme INTEL HBRPEKNX02 29GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 27GB free Firmware: K5110440 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 240 268 273 262 265 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.2% Very good	Read 676 Write 240 Mixed 283 SusWrite 259 80% 364 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 23.6 95% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 121 92% 125 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 261%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GB 4,747 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.3% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11.9 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 297 13% 297 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	4x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	4x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	3x
INTEL HBRPEKNX02 512GBNvmeBench 163%, 83 samples	1x

RAM
K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GBSamsungBench 98%, 4,747 samples	3x
MT53E512M32D2NP-046 2x4GBMicronBench 87%, 764 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16