Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '22 at 01:51
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 159 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 288 40% 298 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 282 231 135 224 257 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 475 Write 459 Mixed 337 SusWrite 252 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 38.8 125% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 352 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$45 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 96GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 98 98 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 175 Write 174 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 98.4 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.7 457% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston Hyper X 2x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 18.8 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	484x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	430x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	272x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	98x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	91x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	88x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	58x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	35x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	47x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	45x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $786

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16