Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 132
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 343
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 82.4
50% 60.8 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 44.8
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
609GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 165 160 162 169 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 364
Write 318
Mixed 299
SusWrite 167
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 35.6
123% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 248
198% 279 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 117%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
134GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 165 164 171 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 368
Write 313
Mixed 304
SusWrite 161
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 36.4
122% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 253
203% 287 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 117%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
20GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 101 96 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 134
Write 142
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 101
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 130 129 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 120
Mixed 116
SusWrite 129
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$50
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 111
Mixed 67
70% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion SW 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 203b
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 133 133 133 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 49.7
Write 112
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 130
128% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 80%
WD Game Drive 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 111 103 110 114 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 82.2
Write 110
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 108
122% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%
Multiple Card Reader 128GB
119GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 16.7
23% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.7
189% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P FX Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback