Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 12:53
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 957
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 112
Parallax 110
106% 117 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.7
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DM F5 512GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 4.4 10 184 71 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 468
Write 433
Mixed 388
SusWrite 82.5
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 21.3
132% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 29.4
76% 153 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback