Sicomputer Nauta 01C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSicomputer Nauta 01C  (all builds)
MotherboardSi NL40_50CU
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200911
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 12:01
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 144
56% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 377
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 40C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 5.3
6% 6.63 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CLR-8W512 512GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQ20901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 306 164 190 355 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 968
Mixed 396
SusWrite 259
160% 723 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 14.4
136% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 61.5
125% 261 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 121%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 24.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nauta 01C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer Nauta 01C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback