HP Laptop 15-dy1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-dy1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C9
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 10:23
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 212
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 399
45% 353 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
HP(103C 86C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 11.5
7% 9.27 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 14.8
8% 8.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+238G 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 58 7.3 3.8 47 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 101%
Midasfor ce SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 343 333 324 342 365 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57% Above average
Read 335
Write 295
Mixed 270
SusWrite 339
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 14
61% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 79.3
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 21.3
39% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 14.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-dy1xxx Builds (Compare 1,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-dy1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback