Huananzhi X99-8M

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-8M (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-8M
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210120
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 621 58% 483 Pts	64-Core 843 52% 843 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.4% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 51.8 32% 43.4 fps	MRender 54.5 Gravity 49 Splatting 39.1 38% 47.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 190 132 76 99 114 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 433 Write 404 Mixed 386 SusWrite 145 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 0.5 78% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 7.9 DQ Mixed 0.4 30% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: MN6OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 148 148 149 148 148 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 134 Write 136 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 148 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 866GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 173 173 175 175 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 169 Mixed 110 SusWrite 169 118% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 1x16GB 357 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.8% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-8M Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Huananzhi X99-8M

CPU
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2683 v4IntelBench 68%, 398 samples	2x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	1x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	1x

RAM
HNMI8GD4240D0 2x8GBUnknownBench 57%, 153 samples	4x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 97 samples	2x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16