Asrock H61M-IDE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-IDE  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131113
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 344
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1670 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 25
21% 27 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 19.7
20% 25.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 89 13 70 4.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.2% Very poor
Read 247
Write 218
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 50.2
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 0.3
17% 5.97 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
4% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
488GB free
Firmware: AX1P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 91 91 90 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 81.7
Write 85.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 89.2
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-IDE Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-IDE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback