Dell Inspiron 5555

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 5555  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FXF2C
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160830
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 18:13
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 69.7
36% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 118
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Dell(1028 06BF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.4
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 83 65 80 72 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46% Average
Read 86.3
Write 91
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 73.8
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 30 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 31
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 29.3
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5173DB0-YK0 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 5555 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 5555

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback