Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 174
2-Core 343
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,280
117% 980 Pts
64-Core 2,809
174% 2,809 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 101
Parallax 114
93% 110 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 108
Splatting 89.2
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1229 950 984 984 1315 990 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,508
Write 1473
Mixed 1,505
SusWrite 1,075
365% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 49.1
170% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 105
186% 396 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 242%
Great: 410%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 1TB
706GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 537 536 335 0 321 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 336
Write 588
Mixed 427
SusWrite 398
99% 437 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 3.9
58% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 0.1
43% 110 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 89%
External USB3.0 250GB
127GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 28 28 27 35 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 43 49 49 60 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 51
108% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 45%
TOSHIBA MK3252GSX 320GB
216GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 44 49 49 60 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 59.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 51.1
60% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 26.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback