Lenovo 82NQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 82NQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 12:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 177
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 298
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FB3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.1
7% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 250GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 362 360 349 341 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 371
Write 282
Mixed 334
SusWrite 343
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 9.6
67% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 82.3
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 28.7
73% 145 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart Brazil SDQC8G8W16XCWE9N1T Brazil SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 23.1
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82NQ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82NQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback