Apple iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 00:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,110
100% 841 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0195) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 81.3
53% 67.6 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 41.2
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP510 4TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 1716 1596 820 887 854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,097
Write 1,724
Mixed 1,293
SusWrite 1,284
306% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 33.9
104% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 976
732% 979 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 198%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Mac SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 29.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Apple iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback