Casper EXCALIBUR D300

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR D300 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Z270M MORTAR (MS-7A69)
Memory	6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170420
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '22 at 23:24
Run Duration	397 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	50%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63% Good	Memory 65.4 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 195 65% 118 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 596 55% 461 Pts	64-Core 641 40% 641 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 99.9 Parallax 63.2 50% 75 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 62.4 52% 64 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB 3,055 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT2200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 129 152 185 203 189 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 396 Write 383 Mixed 313 SusWrite 178 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 26.8 102% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 228 196% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 841GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 124 126 131 132 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 174 Write 156 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 126 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FBD 1x16GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 12 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXCALIBUR D300 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Casper EXCALIBUR D300

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 3,089 samples	6x
MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 89%, 3,055 samples	2x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples	1x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 68%, 625 samples	3x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	2x
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 16GBUnknownBench 74%, 43 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16