User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 18:24
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User KGZ-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 172
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 585
55% 459 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67% Good
Lighting 85.5
Reflection 104
Parallax 76.7
70% 88.8 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 68.5
62% 76.6 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B2T6TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 279 283 282 284 283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 2,292
Write 1,200
Mixed 882
SusWrite 298
257% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.1
192% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 419
343% 498 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 194%
Great: 271%
Clover CD103SI 1TB
560GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 92 93 82 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 94
Write 104
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 89
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/8GX 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback