Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 146 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 189 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1355) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.04 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.9% Above average	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 79.6 Parallax 77 62% 77.4 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 75.3 Splatting 60.7 54% 66 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB 11,411 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 29 31 32 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 46.3 Write 52.8 Mixed 40 SusWrite 34.1 32% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown OP 122500 07/14 2M 82B5 OP 122600 07/14 2M 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.8% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x

RAM
SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 1x4GBSmartBench 26%, 348 samples	2x
TMT451U6BFR8C-PBAJ 1x4GBTeikonBench 27%, 50 samples	2x
9905403-038.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 156 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28