Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200818
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 11:17
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 701
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 122
Parallax 8.7
5% 45.8 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11.8
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8200PNP 1TB
307GB free
Firmware: T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1267 808 953 781 918 939 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 790
Write 995
Mixed 945
SusWrite 944
208% 919 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 64.9
212% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 699
DQ Mixed 634
521% 750 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 191%
Great: 355%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 1TB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1789 1563 1506 1518 1435 1258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 1,563
Write 2,202
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 1,512
383% 1,692 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 67.3
216% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 940
701% 932 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 232%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 450 459 434 435 448 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 499
Write 447
Mixed 412
SusWrite 443
334% 450 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 43.2
7,421% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 323
2,980% 327 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 22.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback