Microelectronics G354

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicroelectronics G354  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z370 Gaming K6
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180330
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 07:36
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 248
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 848
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 209
Parallax 201
180% 210 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 153
Splatting 135
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 421 421 432 434 436 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 467
Mixed 448
SusWrite 430
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 64.1
208% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 256
211% 301 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
748GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 374 375 380 378 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 339
Write 340
Mixed 320
SusWrite 371
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 55.6
176% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 226
173% 233 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G M.2 2280 256GB
221GB free
Firmware: ABDA4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 314 311 317 320 320 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 121%
WD WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 1TB
542GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 475 476 482 481 479 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 466
Write 485
Mixed 456
SusWrite 478
350% 472 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 66.2
11,526% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
3,256% 351 MB/s
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 186 186 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 183
Mixed 120
SusWrite 186
232% 175 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 1.1
526% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
387% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 25.2
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 30.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 51.4
78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G354 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Microelectronics G354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback