ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire V3-371

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Acer Aspire V3-371 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire V3-371
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '22 at 15:31
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 83.3 2-Core 138 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 191 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 0919) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 5.7 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 6.5 4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB 930 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 320 330 316 163 358 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 197 Write 266 Mixed 300 SusWrite 301 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 37.6 127% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 274 230% 334 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 117%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 609GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 54 31 58 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 133 Write 117 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 50.4 110% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 65%
External USB3.0 500GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 465GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 56 56 32 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 101 Write 98.9 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 51.8 94% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 133%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB 4,475 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 2627 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 53 30 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 104 Write 94.3 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 49 95% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 64%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 109GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 34 21 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.6% Poor	Read 56.6 Write 7.7 Mixed 37 SusWrite 32.3 40% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%
External USB3.0 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 114GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 52 51 30 55 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.1% Poor	Read 57.9 Write 52.5 Mixed 33 SusWrite 48.2 63% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 26%
ipTIME External 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 611GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 35 21 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 86.3 Write 28.8 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 32.6 57% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 161%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.1 5.2 5.1 4.6 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.31% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 3.8 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 5.2 9% 8.27 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 26% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.31% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 1,286 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 15.9 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Aspire V3-371 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-371

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	42x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	40x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	29x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	100x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	72x
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	20x

SSD
RBU-SC100S37120GE 120GBKingstonBench 48%, 298 samples	23x
RBU-SC100S37240GE 240GBKingstonBench 53%, 510 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	44x
ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 5,526 samples	15x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback