MSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 09:39
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 843
77% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 66.8
60% 71.5 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 65
54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 344 329 312 304 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,031
Write 998
Mixed 991
SusWrite 366
190% 847 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 55.9
186% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 163
134% 186 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 130%
Great: 203%
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK960MAV 960GB
747GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 393 393 393 392 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 420
Write 396
Mixed 316
SusWrite 391
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 29.8
102% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 98.1
121% 212 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
761GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 88 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 82.1
Write 85.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 86.6
55% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
45GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 172 171 172 168 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 135
Write 103
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 170
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
54GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 56 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 54.1
Mixed 19
SusWrite 55.6
33% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 45%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
309GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 37.6
Write 36
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 37.7
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 35.7
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 5,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback