MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 254%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 284%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics253% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 23:07
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 150
2-Core 304
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,214
107% 909 Pts
64-Core 2,189
136% 2,189 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
EVGA(3842 4985) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Lighting 383
Reflection 333
Parallax 420
312% 378 fps
MRender 408
Gravity 326
Splatting 216
248% 316 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 253%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Seagate FireCuda 2TB
674GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 1170 903 944 943 943 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 3,738
Mixed 2,135
SusWrite 957
494% 2,178 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 75.3
275% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 962
699% 903 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 257%
Great: 404%
Amd-raid WDC WDBNCE0010PN 1TB
536GB free
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 355 318 303 299 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 283
Write 374
Mixed 284
SusWrite 319
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 13.4
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 47.5
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 55.2
47% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 80%
Amd-raid Sabrent Rocket 4 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: RKT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2995 3168 3051 3018 3042 3040 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 693
Write 1,542
Mixed 1,083
SusWrite 3,052
365% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 42.8
201% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 958
669% 820 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 307%
Great: 384%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 431 431 431 431 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 402
Write 420
Mixed 388
SusWrite 429
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 38.3
126% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 126
104% 145 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid WDC WD3001FFSX-6 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 158 163 164 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
Read 90.8
Write 164
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 160
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid ST8000DM004-2CX1 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 168 174 179 176 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 58.3
Write 121
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 172
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 74.4
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 45.9
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38.6
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 143%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback