Cyberpowerpc Tracer III XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc Tracer III XTREME  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberPowerPC Tracer III XTREME
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 10:04
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 639
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1043) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 7.5
5% 7 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 60.4
46% 62.6 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 62.5
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 327 320 316 308 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 700
Write 1,423
Mixed 684
SusWrite 350
179% 789 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.3
222% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 800
606% 819 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 155%
Great: 280%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
381GB free
Firmware: GH2OA470
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 103 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 66.3
Write 66.7
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 104
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Tracer III XTREME Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Cyberpowerpc Tracer III XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback