Lenovo 20F9004LUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20F9004LUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F9004LUS
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 18:47
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 81
2-Core 150
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 218
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 6
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 542 306 304 306 305 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,459
Write 963
Mixed 708
SusWrite 430
197% 890 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.3
244% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 625
473% 643 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 189%
Great: 247%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
175GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 273 292 289 287 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 225
Mixed 211
SusWrite 278
327% 239 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 22.2
1,516% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 26.5
2,272% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 164%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Chip DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 9.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F9004LUS Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F9004LUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback