MSI FM2-A85XMA-P33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A85XMA-P33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 18:14
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 75
2-Core 132
55% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 208
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 20.8
15% 19.2 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 17.4
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 33 32 34 34 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 459
Write 404
Mixed 287
SusWrite 62
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 39.2
136% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 148
138% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
729GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 118 121 120 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 102
Write 115
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 118
72% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1 KHX1600C10D3/8G 3 KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A85XMA-P33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A85XMA-P33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback