Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardHuananzhi X58-RX3.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5570-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 135
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 278
31% 243 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8585) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 20.6
14% 23 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 22.9
20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shinedisk M667 120G 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 36 43 35 28 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22% Poor
Read 213
Write 201
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 48.1
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 4.3
38% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22%
Great: 86%
SH00R512GB 512GB
449GB free
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 186 195 211 213 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 244
Write 229
Mixed 224
SusWrite 190
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 17.5
70% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 40.6
73% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 127 125 130 131 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 115
Write 122
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 124
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback