Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 765
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 13B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 7.4
5% 15.2 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 399 406 415 417 415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 1,140
Mixed 948
SusWrite 419
196% 870 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 52.9
178% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 720
605% 867 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 161%
Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
329GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 25 23 29 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 127
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 33.2
33% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_PX505GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback