Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive453% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 10:50
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 171
2-Core 252
100% 173 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 942
85% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,639
101% 1,639 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 107
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 93.2
87% 95.7 fps
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 10.2
33% 42.6 fps
Poor: 69% Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3308 3423 2903 1722 1725 1751 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
453% Outstanding
Read 3,085
Write 3,376
Mixed 3,091
SusWrite 2,472
678% 3,006 MB/s
4K Read 80.6
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 113
377% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,550
DQ Write 1218
DQ Mixed 1,366
1,027% 1,378 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 453%
Great: 488%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 441 441 440 437 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 439
Mixed 398
SusWrite 438
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 49.4
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
103GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 150 150 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 456
Mixed 404
SusWrite 184
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 55.1
184% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 202
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 115%
Asmt106x_ V0Safe 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 190920
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 180 180 179 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 66.9
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 177
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.9
484% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 118%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
20GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 251
Write 81.7
Mixed 48.8
125% 127 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 8.6
688% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 10
798% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4066 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 37.8
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 35
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 41.6
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,676
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback