Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive444% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 13:41
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 296
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,096
100% 841 Pts
64-Core 1,485
92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.32
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 106
Reflection 88
Parallax 93.2
86% 95.7 fps
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 67.3
62% 71.1 fps
Poor: 68% Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3280 3363 3034 1718 1714 1765 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2,964
Write 3434
Mixed 3,132
SusWrite 2,479
678% 3,002 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 116
380% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1383
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1229
922% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 444%
Great: 477%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 442 444 442 443 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 432
Mixed 402
SusWrite 442
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 50.9
168% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 182
142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
99GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 150 150 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 458
Mixed 410
SusWrite 184
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 57
192% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 115%
Asmt106x_ V0Safe 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 190920
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 180 180 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 96.6
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 177
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.7
457% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
19GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 251
Write 96
Mixed 100
160% 149 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.5
704% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 10.4
820% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4066 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 37.8
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 33.8
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 42.7
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback