Toshiba Satellite C50D-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C50D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131225
Uptime	182 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 17:31
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Memory 28.4 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 30.9 16% 25 Pts	4-Core 30.7 8-Core 31.2 4% 31 Pts	64-Core 29.8 2% 29.8 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA26) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.69 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.48 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 277GB free (System drive) Firmware: LV011C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1664 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2602 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 3718 (0A) Spinup retry count 152 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2333 (B8) Unknown 24 24 76 (BB) vendor-specific 24 24 76 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 43 656801831 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 121 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6029404 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 43903 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 244813791271 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8275 (DE) Loaded hours 93 93 3121 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 219 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	31.2% Below average	Read 52.9 Write 55.6 Mixed 54.2 41% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.24 65% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 264 15% 264 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C50D-A Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C50D-A

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	8x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	3x
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	8x
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 620 samples	3x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,518 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16