HP Compaq nx7300 (GB850ES#AKN)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq nx7300 (GB850ES#AKN)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30A2
Memory1.5 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo T2350
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 19.5
2-Core 38
27% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 38.4
8-Core 38.4
5% 38.4 Pts
64-Core 32.4
2% 32.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SB4OC7BP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 28 27 20 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 25.6
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 24.5
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 25%
USB1003A Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 2093
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 2.9 2.9 2.7 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.35% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 2.2
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 2.9
5% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
2048, 512 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.2% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback