Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA560
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '22 at 20:13
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 97.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 262 94% 167 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 828 78% 648 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3185 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 163 Parallax 151 134% 159 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 115 Splatting 106 105% 132 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1042 782 761 738 713 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,726 Write 1,788 Mixed 1,023 SusWrite 907 305% 1,361 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 54.3 203% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,319 DQ Write 970 DQ Mixed 1114 841% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 297%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 631GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 418 416 410 395 383 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 356 Write 346 Mixed 335 SusWrite 404 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 27.3 79% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 136 100% 131 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 37.6 MC Mixed 28 98% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 40 SC Mixed 29 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 47.7 84% 47.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	731x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	270x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	207x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	271x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	183x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	409x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	160x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 2,477 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16