Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705QA
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 19:20
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 88.1
37% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 165
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 1911) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 168 154 95 55 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB
365GB free
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 366 492 577 693 723 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,044
Write 827
Mixed 766
SusWrite 561
179% 800 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 38.7
128% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 197
152% 211 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 126%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK F4-2666C19-8GRS 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback