Lenovo 90FA0032MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90FA0032MT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO CRESCENTBAY
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 14:19
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 86%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3215U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 97.9
43% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 96.3
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 86.3
5% 86.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3648) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 240 297 328 306 340 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 298
Write 350
Mixed 323
SusWrite 300
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 19.9
56% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 46
60% 109 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 92%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
10GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.3 10 7.9 8.9 9.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 78
Write 0.5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 8
21% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FA0032MT Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FA0032MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback