Acer Aspire Z3-610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire Z3-610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z3-610
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 69%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 112
56% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0842) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 5.2
2% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 361 404 412 393 422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 450
Write 412
Mixed 269
SusWrite 397
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 26.5
91% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 246
211% 311 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 16.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z3-610 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z3-610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback